Natural history plates: animals, plants, ecosystems
10 tasks ·
11 models tested ·
110 results
Deciduous trees
image
googlegemini-2.5-flash-image
7.9 s
googlegemini-2.5-flash-image
Cost< 0.01 $
Resolution1344 x 768
Time7.9 s
googlegemini-3-pro-image-preview
24.8 s
googlegemini-3-pro-image-preview
Cost< 0.01 $
Resolution2752 x 1536
Time24.8 s
googleimagen-4.0-fast-generate-001
4.7 s
googleimagen-4.0-fast-generate-001
Cost0.02 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time4.7 s
googleimagen-4.0-generate-001
8.8 s
googleimagen-4.0-generate-001
Cost0.04 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time8.8 s
googleimagen-4.0-ultra-generate-001
14.3 s
googleimagen-4.0-ultra-generate-001
Cost0.08 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time14.3 s
openaichatgpt-image-latest
47.4 s
openaichatgpt-image-latest
Cost0.22 $
Resolution1536 x 1024
Time47.4 s
segmindideogram-3
13.8 s
segmindideogram-3
Cost0.04 $
Resolution1344 x 768
Time13.8 s
segmindseedream-4.5
21.7 s
segmindseedream-4.5
Cost0.04 $
Resolution2560 x 1472
Time21.7 s
segmindseedream-v5-lite
53.2 s
segmindseedream-v5-lite
Cost0.04 $
Resolution2848 x 1600
Time53.2 s
xaigrok-imagine-image
5.3/109.1 s
xaigrok-imagine-image
Cost0.02 $
Resolution2752 x 1504
Time9.1 s
Matania Judgment
Quality
8
Composition
9
Creativity
7
Text accuracy
2
Fidelity
4
Overall
5.25
Review
The visual aesthetics and the quality of the botanical illustration are excellent, perfectly adhering to the style of a naturalist plate. However, the model fails significantly on textual and quantitative constraints: the labels are illegible scribbles, and the number of trees does not match the 12 requested. Consequently, fidelity is very low despite the high artistic quality.
xaigrok-imagine-image-pro
17.8 s
xaigrok-imagine-image-pro
Cost0.07 $
Resolution2816 x 1536
Time17.8 s
Conifers
image
googlegemini-2.5-flash-image
8.5 s
googlegemini-2.5-flash-image
Cost< 0.01 $
Resolution1344 x 768
Time8.5 s
googlegemini-3-pro-image-preview
27.1 s
googlegemini-3-pro-image-preview
Cost< 0.01 $
Resolution2752 x 1536
Time27.1 s
googleimagen-4.0-fast-generate-001
3.9 s
googleimagen-4.0-fast-generate-001
Cost0.02 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time3.9 s
googleimagen-4.0-generate-001
7.7 s
googleimagen-4.0-generate-001
Cost0.04 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time7.7 s
googleimagen-4.0-ultra-generate-001
11.4 s
googleimagen-4.0-ultra-generate-001
Cost0.08 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time11.4 s
openaichatgpt-image-latest
52.2 s
openaichatgpt-image-latest
Cost0.22 $
Resolution1536 x 1024
Time52.2 s
segmindideogram-3
14.0 s
segmindideogram-3
Cost0.04 $
Resolution1344 x 768
Time14.0 s
segmindseedream-4.5
27.7 s
segmindseedream-4.5
Cost0.04 $
Resolution2560 x 1472
Time27.7 s
segmindseedream-v5-lite
60.6 s
segmindseedream-v5-lite
Cost0.04 $
Resolution2848 x 1600
Time60.6 s
xaigrok-imagine-image
6.3/109.8 s
xaigrok-imagine-image
Cost0.02 $
Resolution2752 x 1504
Time9.8 s
Matania Judgment
Quality
8
Composition
9
Creativity
7
Text accuracy
2
Fidelity
6
Overall
6.25
Review
The visual aesthetics and illustration quality are excellent, perfectly adhering to the botanical plate style. However, the model fails in quantitative fidelity by not presenting 10 distinct species and produces illegible, incoherent text—a common issue, but one that is detrimental to a scientific plate.
xaigrok-imagine-image-pro
18.1 s
xaigrok-imagine-image-pro
Cost0.07 $
Resolution2816 x 1536
Time18.1 s
Raptors
image
googlegemini-2.5-flash-image
6.7 s
googlegemini-2.5-flash-image
Cost< 0.01 $
Resolution1344 x 768
Time6.7 s
googlegemini-3-pro-image-preview
27.1 s
googlegemini-3-pro-image-preview
Cost< 0.01 $
Resolution2752 x 1536
Time27.1 s
googleimagen-4.0-fast-generate-001
4.4 s
googleimagen-4.0-fast-generate-001
Cost0.02 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time4.4 s
googleimagen-4.0-generate-001
9.7 s
googleimagen-4.0-generate-001
Cost0.04 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time9.7 s
googleimagen-4.0-ultra-generate-001
14.7 s
googleimagen-4.0-ultra-generate-001
Cost0.08 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time14.7 s
openaichatgpt-image-latest
50.4 s
openaichatgpt-image-latest
Cost0.22 $
Resolution1536 x 1024
Time50.4 s
segmindideogram-3
13.9 s
segmindideogram-3
Cost0.04 $
Resolution1344 x 768
Time13.9 s
segmindseedream-4.5
20.0 s
segmindseedream-4.5
Cost0.04 $
Resolution2560 x 1472
Time20.0 s
segmindseedream-v5-lite
52.8 s
segmindseedream-v5-lite
Cost0.04 $
Resolution2848 x 1600
Time52.8 s
xaigrok-imagine-image
6.3/107.1 s
xaigrok-imagine-image
Cost0.02 $
Resolution2752 x 1504
Time7.1 s
Matania Judgment
Quality
8
Composition
9
Creativity
7
Text accuracy
2
Fidelity
6
Overall
6.25
Review
The naturalist illustration aesthetic is excellent, and the composition faithfully respects the "ornithological plate" look. However, fidelity is penalized by the model's inability to generate exactly 8 birds and, above all, by completely illegible and incoherent text, thereby failing the objective of the labels.
xaigrok-imagine-image-pro
20.2 s
xaigrok-imagine-image-pro
Cost0.07 $
Resolution2816 x 1536
Time20.2 s
Butterflies of the world
image
googlegemini-2.5-flash-image
9.1 s
googlegemini-2.5-flash-image
Cost< 0.01 $
Resolution1344 x 768
Time9.1 s
googlegemini-3-pro-image-preview
26.9 s
googlegemini-3-pro-image-preview
Cost< 0.01 $
Resolution2752 x 1536
Time26.9 s
googleimagen-4.0-fast-generate-001
5.1 s
googleimagen-4.0-fast-generate-001
Cost0.02 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time5.1 s
googleimagen-4.0-generate-001
8.8 s
googleimagen-4.0-generate-001
Cost0.04 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time8.8 s
googleimagen-4.0-ultra-generate-001
10.3 s
googleimagen-4.0-ultra-generate-001
Cost0.08 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time10.3 s
openaichatgpt-image-latest
54.9 s
openaichatgpt-image-latest
Cost0.22 $
Resolution1536 x 1024
Time54.9 s
segmindideogram-3
14.5 s
segmindideogram-3
Cost0.04 $
Resolution1344 x 768
Time14.5 s
segmindseedream-4.5
24.2 s
segmindseedream-4.5
Cost0.04 $
Resolution2560 x 1472
Time24.2 s
segmindseedream-v5-lite
51.3 s
segmindseedream-v5-lite
Cost0.04 $
Resolution2848 x 1600
Time51.3 s
xaigrok-imagine-image
5.1/109.1 s
xaigrok-imagine-image
Cost0.02 $
Resolution2752 x 1504
Time9.1 s
Matania Judgment
Quality
8
Composition
9
Creativity
7
Text accuracy
1
Fidelity
4
Overall
5.13
Review
The visual aesthetics and image quality are excellent, perfectly capturing the style of an entomological plate. However, the model fails significantly on textual and quantitative constraints: the labels are illegible or composed of random characters, and the number of species does not match the requested 16 specimens. Fidelity is therefore heavily penalized by the inability to generate coherent text and an accurate count.
xaigrok-imagine-image-pro
21.6 s
xaigrok-imagine-image-pro
Cost0.07 $
Resolution2816 x 1536
Time21.6 s
Reef fish
image
googlegemini-2.5-flash-image
8.2 s
googlegemini-2.5-flash-image
Cost< 0.01 $
Resolution1344 x 768
Time8.2 s
googlegemini-3-pro-image-preview
24.8 s
googlegemini-3-pro-image-preview
Cost< 0.01 $
Resolution2752 x 1536
Time24.8 s
googleimagen-4.0-fast-generate-001
7.1 s
googleimagen-4.0-fast-generate-001
Cost0.02 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time7.1 s
googleimagen-4.0-generate-001
9.3 s
googleimagen-4.0-generate-001
Cost0.04 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time9.3 s
googleimagen-4.0-ultra-generate-001
14.2 s
googleimagen-4.0-ultra-generate-001
Cost0.08 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time14.2 s
openaichatgpt-image-latest
48.4 s
openaichatgpt-image-latest
Cost0.22 $
Resolution1536 x 1024
Time48.4 s
segmindideogram-3
14.4 s
segmindideogram-3
Cost0.04 $
Resolution1344 x 768
Time14.4 s
segmindseedream-4.5
31.3 s
segmindseedream-4.5
Cost0.04 $
Resolution2560 x 1472
Time31.3 s
segmindseedream-v5-lite
64.9 s
segmindseedream-v5-lite
Cost0.04 $
Resolution2848 x 1600
Time64.9 s
xaigrok-imagine-image
5.1/1010.1 s
xaigrok-imagine-image
Cost0.02 $
Resolution2752 x 1504
Time10.1 s
Matania Judgment
Quality
8
Composition
9
Creativity
7
Text accuracy
1
Fidelity
4
Overall
5.13
Review
The aesthetics and visual quality are excellent, truly reminiscent of a marine biology plate. However, the model fails heavily on textual constraints: the labels are visual gibberish, and the number of specimens does not respect the precise instruction of 12 species. Consequently, fidelity is very low despite the beauty of the image.
xaigrok-imagine-image-pro
15.9 s
xaigrok-imagine-image-pro
Cost0.07 $
Resolution2816 x 1536
Time15.9 s
Mushrooms
image
googlegemini-2.5-flash-image
7.1 s
googlegemini-2.5-flash-image
Cost< 0.01 $
Resolution1344 x 768
Time7.1 s
googlegemini-3-pro-image-preview
24.6 s
googlegemini-3-pro-image-preview
Cost< 0.01 $
Resolution2752 x 1536
Time24.6 s
googleimagen-4.0-fast-generate-001
4.5 s
googleimagen-4.0-fast-generate-001
Cost0.02 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time4.5 s
googleimagen-4.0-generate-001
10.4 s
googleimagen-4.0-generate-001
Cost0.04 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time10.4 s
googleimagen-4.0-ultra-generate-001
12.5 s
googleimagen-4.0-ultra-generate-001
Cost0.08 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time12.5 s
openaichatgpt-image-latest
48.5 s
openaichatgpt-image-latest
Cost0.22 $
Resolution1536 x 1024
Time48.5 s
segmindideogram-3
14.9 s
segmindideogram-3
Cost0.04 $
Resolution1344 x 768
Time14.9 s
segmindseedream-4.5
24.8 s
segmindseedream-4.5
Cost0.04 $
Resolution2560 x 1472
Time24.8 s
segmindseedream-v5-lite
66.3 s
segmindseedream-v5-lite
Cost0.04 $
Resolution2848 x 1600
Time66.3 s
xaigrok-imagine-image
4.3/108.2 s
xaigrok-imagine-image
Cost0.02 $
Resolution2752 x 1504
Time8.2 s
Matania Judgment
Quality
8
Composition
7
Creativity
6
Text accuracy
1
Fidelity
3
Overall
4.25
Review
The image is technically successful in terms of aesthetics, but it fails almost entirely regarding textual and structural constraints. Although the "mycology plate" aspect is present, the model failed to generate 12 distinct species, nor did it produce legible text or labels specifying edible versus toxic varieties, which constitutes the very essence of the prompt.
xaigrok-imagine-image-pro
19.7 s
xaigrok-imagine-image-pro
Cost0.07 $
Resolution2816 x 1536
Time19.7 s
Wildflowers
image
googlegemini-2.5-flash-image
7.4 s
googlegemini-2.5-flash-image
Cost< 0.01 $
Resolution1344 x 768
Time7.4 s
googlegemini-3-pro-image-preview
26.8 s
googlegemini-3-pro-image-preview
Cost< 0.01 $
Resolution2752 x 1536
Time26.8 s
googleimagen-4.0-fast-generate-001
6.1 s
googleimagen-4.0-fast-generate-001
Cost0.02 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time6.1 s
googleimagen-4.0-generate-001
6.7 s
googleimagen-4.0-generate-001
Cost0.04 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time6.7 s
googleimagen-4.0-ultra-generate-001
9.8 s
googleimagen-4.0-ultra-generate-001
Cost0.08 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time9.8 s
openaichatgpt-image-latest
50.3 s
openaichatgpt-image-latest
Cost0.22 $
Resolution1536 x 1024
Time50.3 s
segmindideogram-3
13.6 s
segmindideogram-3
Cost0.04 $
Resolution1344 x 768
Time13.6 s
segmindseedream-4.5
14.5 s
segmindseedream-4.5
Cost0.04 $
Resolution2560 x 1472
Time14.5 s
segmindseedream-v5-lite
51.1 s
segmindseedream-v5-lite
Cost0.04 $
Resolution2848 x 1600
Time51.1 s
xaigrok-imagine-image
5.5/109.7 s
xaigrok-imagine-image
Cost0.02 $
Resolution2752 x 1504
Time9.7 s
Matania Judgment
Quality
9
Composition
9
Creativity
8
Text accuracy
2
Fidelity
4
Overall
5.5
Review
The watercolor aesthetic is superb and the technical quality is excellent. However, the model fails heavily on textual and quantitative constraints: the text is unreadable gibberish (very low text_accuracy) and it is impossible to precisely count 15 distinct flowers as requested. Fidelity is therefore penalized by the inability to manage labels and the specific number of elements.
xaigrok-imagine-image-pro
20.2 s
xaigrok-imagine-image-pro
Cost0.07 $
Resolution2816 x 1536
Time20.2 s
Large mammals
image
googlegemini-2.5-flash-image
8.0 s
googlegemini-2.5-flash-image
Cost< 0.01 $
Resolution1344 x 768
Time8.0 s
googlegemini-3-pro-image-preview
26.4 s
googlegemini-3-pro-image-preview
Cost< 0.01 $
Resolution2752 x 1536
Time26.4 s
googleimagen-4.0-fast-generate-001
4.5 s
googleimagen-4.0-fast-generate-001
Cost0.02 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time4.5 s
googleimagen-4.0-generate-001
10.4 s
googleimagen-4.0-generate-001
Cost0.04 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time10.4 s
googleimagen-4.0-ultra-generate-001
11.1 s
googleimagen-4.0-ultra-generate-001
Cost0.08 $
Resolution1408 x 768
Time11.1 s
openaichatgpt-image-latest
53.6 s
openaichatgpt-image-latest
Cost0.22 $
Resolution1536 x 1024
Time53.6 s
segmindideogram-3
13.5 s
segmindideogram-3
Cost0.04 $
Resolution1344 x 768
Time13.5 s
segmindseedream-4.5
28.6 s
segmindseedream-4.5
Cost0.04 $
Resolution2560 x 1472
Time28.6 s
segmindseedream-v5-lite
60.3 s
segmindseedream-v5-lite
Cost0.04 $
Resolution2848 x 1600
Time60.3 s
xaigrok-imagine-image
4.5/1010.0 s
xaigrok-imagine-image
Cost0.02 $
Resolution2752 x 1504
Time10.0 s
Matania Judgment
Quality
7
Composition
8
Creativity
7
Text accuracy
2
Fidelity
3
Overall
4.5
Review
The image is aesthetically pleasing and respects the 'naturalist plate' style, but it fails massively on quantitative and textual constraints. The model does not display 10 distinct mammals, and the text is completely illegible or incoherent (gibberish), which effectively makes the conservation status labels non-existent.
